hoto by Daniel Schludi on Unsplash

A lot is going around on social media related to the 9th Circuit ruling on Health Freedom Defense Fund v. Alberto Carvalho. There is discussion online that this means mandates are done. Unfortunately – that is untrue. This very short substack is to clarify the meaning of this case.

The case is related whether the mRNA jab mandates were allowed under the law. The important point that people are discussing is the part of the case referencing Jacob v. Massachusetts – the case that is relied on to impose vaccine mandates nationally. In the current case the court essentially held that there is a plausible argument that the COVID jabs do not fall under the definition of “vaccine” as it applies in Jacobson.

In Jacobson, the court allowed a small civil penalty to be imposed if someone refused a vaccine in certain circumstances. The definition of vaccine in Jacobson recognized that to be a vaccine an intervention would necessarily prevent the spread of smallpox. In the current case the argument is that, since the COVID jabs do not prevent the transmission of COVID it is not a vaccine but rather a medical intervention. I agree with that argument but this ruling does not mean that argument was won in court.

Here the case is on appeal so the Ninth Circuit is required to accept factual allegations as true until issues of fact can be resolved. It does not mean those issues have been resolved. The Ninth Circuit Court has remanded the case back to the district court where the issues of fact will be resolved so we will see what happens.

Importantly – the Court also noted that Jacobson predated the modern approach to scrutiny we see in the courts. The district court pushed tried to apply rational basis review on this and that should not apply. The court did not specifically deal with this as clearly as I’d have liked but this ruling was a good start. If this goes up on appeal there are additional arguments that should be made but the case is strong and important.

Source

• Nattokinase: 2000 fibrin units (100 milligrams) orally twice a day without food. Breaks down the spike protein.

• Bromelain: 500 milligrams orally once a day without food. Also breaks down the spike protein.

• Curcumin: 500 milligrams orally twice a day (nano, liposomal, or with piperine additive suggested). Blocks the spike protein and prevents it from doing further damage.

Dr. McCullough recommends taking this treatment triad for at least three months for anyone suffering from or worried about post-COVID or post-vaccine syndromes.

Nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin are available over the counter at just about any health food store or pharmacy. But for best-in-class nattokinase, Dr. McCullough recommends Spike Support Formula, which also contains dandelion root, selenium, and a host of other promising ingredients that can help protect you and your family from the prolonged effects of spike proteins.

• Nattokinase (dissolves spike protein)

• Selenium (aids in helping the body repair itself and recover)

• Dandelion root (acts as a detoxifying agent supporting better liver function)

• Black sativa extract (may facilitate cellular repair)

• Green tea extract (provides added defenses at the cellular level through scavenging for free radicals)

• Irish sea moss (could help rebuild damaged tissue and muscle)

• Quercetin
• Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide 35% (2-3 drops in distilled water three time daily)
• Food Grade Bentonite Clay
• Vitamin C
• Zinc
• Apple Pectin powder
• Selenium
• NAC
• EDTA
• Nicotine Patches (14 mg patches… then, cut them up into 2 mg squares (about 6 pieces) and use one every 24 hours)
• Glutathione
• Additionally, you can add Ashuaghanda and Chased Tree (Vitax) Taking these together is what Dr Ardis said helps your body to make natural glutathione so that you won’t have to take that as well unless you want to.

Bromelain: 500 milligrams orally once a day

Nattokinase: 2000 fibrin units (100 milligrams) orally twice a day without food