Pope Francis Unveils Globalist New World Religion at Summit with United Nations Leader

The Pope wants globalism to replace traditional religion.

Published  on Dec 26, 2019 By Shane Trejo

Pope Francis’ war on traditional Catholicism has been ramping up recently, and he castigated Catholics who believe in tradition and refuse to warp Biblical scripture to appease a godless world for creating a “minefield of misunderstanding and hatred.”

“Rigidity and imbalance fuel one another in a vicious circle,” he said. “And these days, the temptation to rigidity has become so apparent.”

“Tradition is not static, it’s dynamic,” Francis added.

Francis revealed the dogma that he intends to replace belief in Christ as savior with last week. He is advocating for Catholics to unite behind a one world government, and surrender their freedom and sovereignty to international interests.

“Trust and dialogue between people and between nations, in multilateralism, in the role of international organizations, and in diplomacy as an instrument for appreciation and understanding, is indispensable for building a peaceful world,” Francis claimed.

“Your clear moral voice shines through – whether you are speaking out on the plight of the most vulnerable, including refugees and migrants … confronting poverty and inequalities … appealing for disarmament… building bridges between communities … and, of course, highlighting the climate emergency through your historic encyclical, ‘Laudato Si’, and so many other vital efforts,” U.N. Secretary General António Guterres said during his meeting with the pontiff.

The “Laudato Si” was a blasphemous encyclical letter issued by Francis in 2015 calling for world government to solve the supposed global warming crisis.

“Climate change is a global problem with grave implications: environmental, social, economic, political and for the distribution of goods. It represents one of the principal challenges facing humanity in our day,” Francis wrote in his second encyclical.

Francis added: “Enforceable international agreements are urgently needed, since local authorities are not always capable of effective intervention… International and regional conventions do exist, but fragmentation and the lack of strict mechanisms of regulation, control and penalization end up undermining these efforts… What is needed, in effect, is an agreement on systems of governance for the whole range of so-called ‘global commons.’”

Francis made fighting global warming a focal point of his speech while standing next to Guterres in the Vatican last week.

“It is necessary to recognize oneself as members of a single humanity and to take care of our land which, generation after generation, has been entrusted to us by God in custody so that we may cultivate it and leave it in inheritance to our children. Commitment to reducing polluting emissions and comprehensive ecology is urgent and necessary: let’s do something before it’s too late,” Francis said.

“We cannot – we must not – look the other way at the injustices, the inequalities, the scandal of hunger in the world, of poverty, of children who die because they have no water, food, the necessary care. We can’t look the other way at any kind of abuse against the little ones. We must fight this plague together,” he said.

Francis – the protector of pedophile predator priests – is an agent of the new world order, working to subvert authentic Christianity at a time when it is under unprecedented attack. (Click to Source)


Complete Jewish Bible

24/7, 365 access to a board certified medical doctor, by phone or video. One low monthly cost of $12.95 for an individual plan or $19.95 for a family plan. No extras! No added consult fees! All inclusive! Visits are anytime, day or night and holidays. Cancel anytime. No one should ever be without this plan and everyone can afford it. This special pricing is for my readers here.

 

UN Officials Block Syrian Christian Refugees from Getting Help

Syrian Refugees | 2019-12-08 18:15:49

Christian Syrian refugees have told CBN News that they have been blocked from getting help from the United Nations Refugee Agency, the UNHCR, by Muslim UN officials in Jordan.

UN Response to Syrian Christians? Get Lost

One of the refugees, Hasan, a Syrian convert to Christianity, told us in a phone call that Muslim UN camp officials “knew that we were Muslims and became Christians and they dealt with us with persecution and mockery. They didn’t let us into the office. They ignored our request.”

A clear pattern of discrimination by the United Nations refugee agency in Jordan against Christians. And it appears to be one reason that while tens of thousands of Syrian Muslim war refugees have been settled in the United States and Britain, only a small number have been Christian.

And the two governments that could stop this persecution of Christian refugees – the US and Britain – have done little to nothing about it.

A Former Archbishop of Canterbury Says “Enough”

Lord George Carey is suing Britain’s home office alleging that “politically correct” officials have been “institutionally biased” against Christian refugees. He also wants to find out why out of 60-thousand Syrian war refugees accepted into the United States and Britain in 2014, almost none were Christians.

Lord Carey’s attorney, Paul Diamond, explains the case:

“You have this absurd situation where the scheme is set up to help Syrian refugees and the people most in need, Christians who have been “genocided,” they can’t even get into the U.N. camps to get the food. If you enter and say I am a Christian or convert, the Muslim U.N. guards will block you [from] getting in and laugh at you and mock you and even threaten you.

Christian Refugee Viewed as the Enemy by Muslim UN Officials

Another Syrian refugee, Timothy, who told us he became a Christian after seeing Jesus in a dream, said he was also blocked from entering a refugee camp by Muslim UN officials.

“All of the United Nations officials, most of them, 99 percent, they are Muslims,” Timothy explained from Jordan, “and they were treating us as enemies.”

Diamond says, “Sunni Muslim officials have blocked the way. They’ve laughed at them, threatened them, said ‘You shouldn’t have converted. You’re an idiot for converting. You get what you get,’ words to that effect.”

Carey says by doing nothing, western governments are complicit in what calls “the steady crucifixion of Middle East Christians.”

“And no simple measures are taken by both the British and the American government,’ Diamond says, “It would be simple just to open up a refugee camp for religious minorities, for Christians, Yazidis, whatever they are, and they’d be safe. But no one does that.”

Nations Also Deporting Christian Refugees to Certain Imprisonment or Death

Christians refugees who have made it to western countries are increasingly being deported back to Muslim nations, with no regard for the danger they will face.

Swedish attorney Gabriel Donner who represents Christian asylum seekers, says Sweden is now deporting up to one-third of Christian refugees back to Muslim nations where they are likely to be imprisoned or killed.

One of those Christian refugees now facing imminent deportation is Iman Amir-Ourang from Iran, shown here with members of his church in a foot washing. He says Swedish officials either did not understand or care about the evidence of his Christian faith.

Amir-Ourang told us, “There are so many atheists living in Sweden, so they can’t believe in somebody that believes in God. So just because they don’t believe in our Lord, they don’t trust anybody else to believe in the Lord either.”

“They don’t understand the message in the Bible. It’s just completely alien to them,” Donner added.

Britain Ignores Christian Refugees While Welcoming ISIS Children

President Trump told CBN News in 2017 that Christian refugees would be given priority. But Muslim governments officially classify Christians as security threats, causing their asylum applications to western countries to be rejected.

The UN Refugee program did not respond to our request for answers.

Lord Carey has publicly appealed for money in his suit against the British home office, which has already threatened the 84-year churchman with all court costs if he loses.

Meanwhile, Britain’s Home office is spending a lot of time and money on the resettlement of the children of ISIS terrorists. (Click to Source)

CBN


Complete Jewish Bible

The blogging hounds recovery ad

UN poised to launch global ban on speech that insults Muslims

  BY 

Sharia-adherent nations have long “sought a determination from the United Nations that any criticism of Islam or Muslims is ‘Islamophobia’ and banned globally.’”

But somehow Westerners still generally refuse to acknowledge the real meaning and intent of the concept of “Islamophobia.” In short, it’s intended to promote the supremacy of the Sharia by discrediting and silencing critics of Islam. The UN declared its intention to become closer with the OIC years ago, and it has happened. Now:

Nations belonging to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and other governments adhering to Shariah law across the world are ramping up their new campaign with the United Nations to prohibit all speech that Muslims consider offensive.

This aggressive campaign is the logical next step following years of appeasement, thanks to politically correct Western leaders. There have been enough warnings. Now, the final stage for Western subjugation has arrived, and the more Westerners fight for their own right to the freedom of speech, the more aggressive the “Islamophobia” brigade will become, particularly in light of the fact that they have come this far through bullying, intimidation, deceit and manipulation. They’re not about to surrender now, as they have been encouraged by too many Western dhimmis surrendering to them.

Pakistan Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi incited more support to silence any opposition to Islam and its adherents – including speech condemning Islam for its scriptural inciting of terrorists to conduct jihad (holy war) on “infidels.”

Mainstream Muslim groups in the West share the message of Lodhi and routinely persecute those who call out the truth about Islam. Lodhi stated a common message which is now embraced across the West in describing the so-called consequences of those who offend Islam:

“An inevitable consequence is to fan the flames of bigotry, intolerance, anti-Muslim hatred and xenophobia”

An “inclusive political process for durable peace”  by rejecting “Islamophobia” is what Lodhi — and other stealth jihadists who are promoting the Sharia — have duped Westerners into believing as they promote Islamic anti-blasphemy laws.

“UN poised to launch global ban on all criticism of Islam,” by Michael F. Haverluck, One News Now, June 23, 2019:

Nations belonging to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and other governments adhering to Shariah law across the world are ramping up their new campaign with the United Nations to prohibit all speech that Muslims consider offensive.

“Islamist nations … long have sought a determination from the United Nations that any criticism of Islam or Muslims is ‘Islamophobia’ and banned globally,’” WND reported, noting that with 57 members, the OIC represents the largest voting bloc in the U.N. “But each time it has come up for a vote, more realistic arguments prevailed and the campaign never was legitimized.”

Pakistan putting on the pressure
After U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres unveiled the new “U.N. Strategy and Plan of Action” to fight so-called “hate speech” at a special meeting in the packed Economic and Social (ECOSOC) chamber, Pakistan Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi incited more support to silence any opposition to Islam and its adherents – including speech condemning Islam for its scriptural inciting of terrorists to conduct jihad (holy war) on “infidels.”

An inevitable consequence is to fan the flames of bigotry, intolerance, anti-Muslim hatred and xenophobia,” Lodhi proclaimed before ambassadors, senior diplomats and high-ranking U.N. officials, as quoted in a press release, according to MSN. “My Prime Minister Imran Khan has recently again called for urgent action to counter Islamophobia, which is today the most prevalent expression of racism and hatred against ‘the other.’” (Click to Source)

S. 7 Is the Beginning of Gun Confiscation, FEMA Camps and the Darkest Moments In History

Submitted by Dave Hodges on Friday, April 5, 2019 – 12:26.

The UN prescription for disarming America.before the implementation of the FEMA camps and the takeover of the United States

mao

First Venezuela, then South Africa, then the United States. Gun confiscation is always the prelude to genocide. History speaks will America listen?

Gun control and ultimately gun confiscation has begun in earnest inside of the United States. Prior to reporting on the simultaneous gun confiscation programs that have begun in earnest in multiple locations, I would first like to visually and graphically present an historical lesson about the dangers that gun control/confiscation poses to a population at the hands of their government.

guns

I once interviewed Paul Martin regarding door-to-door visits by law enforcement all around the country. This is increasing exponentially as evidenced by ex-California Governor Jerry Brown’s Moon-Beam Militia and they are asking residents if they have registered guns. Paul Preston, from Agenda 21 Radio is aware of this as well.

guns

People wonder why I am so opposed to any UN troop presence on American soil. Under the Kigali Principles, the UN has granted itself the right to forcibly enter the sovereign territory of any nation and enact WHATEVER policies they deem necessary to restore the country to a level of normalcy that the UN deems appropriate. Under Obama and former Secretary of State, John Kerry, they both signed the UN Small Arms Treaty which effectively bans all private ownership of guns. If these UN troops ever gain a foothold in America, And there are many people in our country who say this day will never come. Let me remind  you, or perhaps reintroduce the evidence that the UN has resources stored inside of our country that will be used by their so-called “peacekeepers” when that day comes that UN troops are rolling down the streets of America.  Here is one very small piece of evidence that has already been documented on The Common Sense Show.

UN Vehicles housed on abandoned US military bases such as this one in Hagerstown, MD. Someone should ask the current President why these vehicles have not been destroyed as a direct threat to American sovereignty and national security? Given the track record of the United Nations in previous genocides (eg Rwanda and soon-t0-be-South Africa), I view the presence of any UN personnel and equipment on American soil as a direct and personal threat to both my family and my country.

Make no mistake about it, the UN is here to take your guns. They will finish the job that the states are unable to complete.

Gun Confiscation Orders (ie Red Flag Laws) which have been passed in 13 states with sage four liberalism.

Currently, Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham has said that he’s working with anti-gun fanatic Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) to craft a Gun Confiscation proposal.

“Under the Blumenthal-Graham proposal, states would presumably be bribed to enact statutes which allow police or an angry “ex” to convene “secret courts” to strip gun owners of their Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.”

S. 7 is currently the only “red flag” confiscation bill in Congress. And it is extreme as the liberal authorities can convene a “secret court” where neither the targeted gun owner nor his attorney is allowed to appear. The secret court “hearing” is so draconian it can be conducted by telephone.

Find hiding places for some of your guns. Refuse to answer questions when the police come to your home and are attempting to violate your Second Amendment rights.

The University of Hawaii Democide project showed that when a people give up their guns, genocide follows. It happened 16 times in the 20th Century. Will America be the first in the 21st Century? (Click to Source)

 

At “World Government Summit,” Globalists Push UN Agenda 2030

Written by  Alex Newman

Friday, 22 February 2019

Top globalists are coming out of the closet. Thousands of leading globalists, communists, Islamists and others from around the world converged on the Arabian Peninsula this month for the World Government Summit. Their goal: promote technocratic globalism and plot the future of what they often call their “New World Order.” Senior officials from the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, Communist China, central banks, and even the Trump administration showed up to mingle with heads of state and advocates of Islamic Sharia law from across the region. Even Pope Francis delivered a message. As usual, despite top U.S. media outlets partnering with the summit, the establishment press in the United States largely failed to inform Americans about it.

News releases promoting the World Government Summit — yes, it is really called the World Government Summit — boasted that the event “is setting the agenda for the next generation of governments.” And one of the key goals of the summit was advancing the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), often referred to as UN Agenda 2030. UN Deputy-Secretary General Amina Mohammed opened the summit by demanding that the radical UN scheme be implemented to avoid “life-threatening consequences for billions of people.” UN “High Commissioner for the 2030 Agenda” Cristina Gallach echoed the hysteria. And throughout the summit, more than a few speakers touted the controversial UN agenda as if it were the key to saving humanity from every problem under the sun.

The UN goals, as this magazine has documented, include national and global wealth redistribution, government control over the economy, globalist indoctrination of all children, surrendering more sovereignty to global institutions, and much more. They are essentially a “master plan for humanity,” as UN bosses put it, to build a global technocratic government that would dominate every facet of human existence. Unsurprisingly, the mass-murdering Communist dictatorship enslaving China boasted that it played a “crucial role” in developing the UN agenda. And dictators from around the world celebrated the plan as well. The World Government Summit formally launched its SDG’s in Action @ WGS platform in 2016 in partnership with the UN, the World Bank, and other outfits.

And the line-up of speakers was universally supportive of the agenda. In an address delivered to the World Government Summit after signing a controversial agreement with a top Sunni Muslim imam, Pope Francis, a fervent advocate of UN Agenda 2030, offered his “best wishes” for the work of summit attendees. Urging cooperation to address the “problems of each person in the global village,” the pope called for more environmentalism while using leftist rhetoric to drive a wedge between “people” and “capital and economic interests.”

Pope Francis also specifically promoted sustainable development, which is the ideology underpinning the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals that seeks to limit the human population and fundamentally transform civilization under the guise of saving the planet. “We cannot really speak of sustainable development without solidarity,” he said, using a buzzword that, along with “fraternity,” has become a staple for the pope and has raised alarm even among Catholic scholars. “We could even say that the good, if it is not the common good, is not actually good….I hope that your efforts at the service of the common good may bear fruit.”

The pope’s blessing of the World Government Summit was especially bizarre considering that in 2017, the event took place under the shadow of a replica of the Roman arch in front of the pagan Temple of Ba’al. The monument to the demonic idol, who is frequently referenced in the Bible, originally stood in Palmyra, Syria, a city known in the Bible as Tadmore. Among other concerns, this false pagan god demanded child sacrifices and other horrors that outraged the God of the Bible. While a number of replicas were planned, the very first was prominently displayed at the 2017 World Government Summit, attracting fierce criticism and deep concern among religious scholars — especially in light of the “World Government” motif.

As in previous years, some celebrities showed up to lecture humanity about the alleged need to submit to global governance and sustainable development to supposedly save the planet from humanity. Actor Harrison Ford (shown), for instance, went on a tirade against “nationalism” and “isolationism” after a bizarre segment in which he pretended to speak for “nature.” “I could give a damn with or without humans, I’m the ocean,” Ford said, pretending to be “nature” while speaking in a strange voice. “I covered this entire planet once, and I can always cover it again.” It was not clear whether he intended to refer to the biblical flood of Noah’s time or some other period during which he believes the oceans may have covered the entire planet.

Ford, a lifelong Democrat, also slammed President Donald Trump for allegedly denying “science” on climate change. “Around the world, elements of leadership including in my own country to preserve their state and the status quo, deny or denigrate science,” Ford said as whistleblowers and scientists from the UN continued to expose the UN’s lies and pseudo-science. “They are on the wrong side of history.” According to UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change sea-level reviewer Dr. Nils-Axel Morner, however, who resigned in disgust when the UN IPCC refused to correct its false information, the lies underpinning the man-made global-warming hypothesis will inevitably be exposed.

Globalists were everywhere at the event. IMF boss Christine Lagarde, who suggested the IMF might be moved from Washington to Beijing, was a key speaker. Other leading globalist managers speaking at the summit included the scandal-plagued chief of UN WIPO Francis Gurry, who has come under fire for retaliating against whistleblowers and trying to have a reporter prosecuted. UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) chief Audrey Azoulay, a socialist working to standardize the indoctrination of children worldwide, spoke as well. UN Development Program (UNDP) boss Achim Steiner, UNICEF boss Henrietta Fore, UN General Assembly President Maria Espinoza, World Food Programme chief David Beasley, totalitarian-minded UN SDG peddler Jeffery Sachs, World Economic Forum (WEF) boss Klaus Schwab, and numerous other globalist leaders spoke there, too.

Among the prominent “media partners” of the World Government Summit listed on the website were The New York Times, the Financial Times, Bloomberg, CNBC, the “fake news” kingpins at CNN, Sky News (owned by the owner of Fox News), and many others. It was not clear how they were expected to maintain impartiality about the agenda while also sponsoring the summit. Arianna Huffington of the fringe left-wing website Huffington Post and CNN International anchor Becky Anderson even spoke there, along with other media personalities. But as usual, there was very little coverage of the event in American media, perhaps because top globalists tend to openly promote globalism in a way that would alarm the U.S. public and jeopardize the agenda.

Consider, for instance, the speech delivered by Rwandan President Paul Kagame, who spent much of his time promoting the subversion of sovereignty via “regional and continental integration,” as he put it, to create a united African continent. “We will only realize our full promise, by joining together our historically fragmented markets, and making it easier for people, goods, and services to move across our continent,” he said, boasting of efforts by the globalist African Union (AU) to smash nation-states. “That is why the African Union adopted the African Continental Free Trade Area, which is due to enter into force later this year. We have also adopted a Protocol on the Free Movement of People.”

Of course, as leading globalist luminaries such as former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger have explained, regional governments such as the EU, the AU, and more are a critical component of the globalist vision for the “New World Order.” That is why the EU, the U.S. government, and the Communist Chinese government have been pouring money into the AU and other emerging regional governments. Even Russian strongman Vladimir Putin is in the process of building a “Eurasian Union,” as globalists in the United States pursue deeper integration of “North America” via NAFTA and the USMCA.

Also attending the World Government Summit was Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, who urged investors to invest in Pakistan even while boasting about the glories of a welfare state. “I am really against this neo-liberal economics where you have 62 people owning as much wealth as 3 billion people on this Earth,” he told the audience, arguing that governments must take responsibility for taking care of poor people. Former Colombian President Juan Santos, who tried to hand his country over the Marxist terrorists with help from key globalists, spoke as well.

Aside from the major media outlets, Big Business partnered with the World Government Summit were Mastercard, KPMG, Deloitte, McKinsey & Company, and many other Big Business affiliates. A broad array of “global governance” institutions partnered with the World Government peddlers, too, including the UN, the IMF, the World Health Organization, the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the World Trade Organization, the UN World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and more.

Among the more than 4,000 participants from 140 countries were a number of high-profile Americans. Among those who spoke on stage was U.S. Energy Secretary Rick Perry, a Bilderberg attendee, who announced a robotics competition from the stage. Daniel Kaniewski, the deputy administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), was also there. Disgraced EPA boss Lisa Jackson from the Obama administration, who still serves on the disgraced Clinton Foundation board, was at the globalist summit as well. And former Trump Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s chief of staff Margaret Peterlin spoke, too.

While the establishment media keep Americans divided and distracted with deception and frivolity, ignoring real news such as the “World Government Summit,” globalists are dropping the mask and coming out of the closet for all to see. It seems everyone is welcome in the emerging New World Order — globalists, communists, Islamists, technocrats, Big Business, and more — except patriotic Americans and Christian conservatives. Liberty-loving Americans must expose the subversive globalist agenda before it snuffs out liberty, prosperity, and Western Christian civilization worldwide. (Click to source)

Photo of Harrison Ford at World Government Summit: AP Images

This Is How The United Nations Is Working To Complete The Destruction Of America And Is Behind The Mass Censorship Of Conservatives

– Should Democrats win the White House in 2020, America’s final fall into tyranny will be swift and complete

By Stefan Stanford – All News Pipeline – Live Free Or Die

September 29, 2018

Back on August 30th, the New American published a story within which they reported that a fringe Islamic prince who had become the United Nations ‘High Commissioner for Human Rights’ had set a new target: free speech on the internet. Famous for comparing President Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler and for protecting UN child-raping troops from being prosecuted, Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein called on big tech to proactively step up their censorship campaigns, with facebook and google more than happy to comply with his demands.

Also a frequent advocate for gun control in America, al-Hussein’s bid to take down ‘free speech’ was centered upon stopping ‘hate speech’ while also demanding that the internet be governed by ‘United Nations human rights law‘, which as we’ll see detailed below, is completely different from the inalienable, God-given rights that we have here in America, rights that are protected by the US Constitution: The UN’s version of ‘human rights’ can be taken away by government.

And with ‘hate speech’ still ‘protected speech’ here in America despite the fact that many on the left would be happy to criminalize such speech, what is ‘hateful speech’ to some is clearly much different from what is ‘hateful speech’ to others, with the left somehow insanely believing that they hold the moral high ground on what is ‘hateful’ and what is ‘righteous’ despite their full embrace of the totalitarian, luciferian doctrine of the globalists.

And we’re now seeing more of the results of the UN/globalists/democrats bid to censor those who are opposed to their totalitarian globalism, with All News Pipeline once again under massive and seemingly co-ordinated attacks by ‘big tech’.  As you can see in the recent screenshots below, both youtube and pinterest have delivered blows to our ability to both publicize our stories and make money for our videos, with pinterest taking down the ANP board while youtube has taken away our ability to monetize our videos.

pinterest_censors_anp.png
As Susan Duclos told me, the only thing that she’s ever posted to pinterest is our ANP stories yet according to pinterest, our ‘All News PipeLine’ board has been removed because it included many ‘pins’ that went against their policies on ‘hate speech’. For those who’ve been reading ANP for quite some time, you’re well aware of the kinds of stories that we publish here. Are our stories ‘hate speech’ in your minds? We remind you that it has long been said that truth will be treason in the empire of lies, the empire constructed around the American people over the past decade+ by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, RINO’s in Congress and the mainstream media.

So are ANP stories ‘hate speech’ or do they just contain the kind of information that the mainstream media isn’t publishing, information that absolutely NEEDS to be published so that people can make their own decisions upon, rather than solely taking the word of the mainstream media outlets that have been pushing the globalists agenda for many years?

And as we’ve seen in the UK, Canada and throughout much of Europe, speech is being criminalized with those who insult Islam being put into prison while here in the US and twitterville, the latest acts of censorship finds twitter suspending an Infowars account for criticizing Barack Obama. Yet the left throws mud at President Trump on twitter as if he were their punching bag and twitter allows the insults every day, hour upon end.

And while Democrats dare to soil the name of Brett Kavanaugh by insinuating he participated in ‘rape gangs’ more than 30 years ago, in the UK and elsewhere in Europe, very real Islamic ‘rape gangs’ are targeting and terrorizing innocent women but Tommy Robinson found out what happens when you report upon that kind of thing: they persecute you.

While ANP didn’t make all that many videos, and all of the videos which we made were totally original with only brief snippets of our source material, youtube has also attacked ANP, demonetizing our channel so that any videos we make, we can no longer make money off of. Yet, of course, somehow youtube will continue to make their money off of the videos we produce, another reason to ditch youtube in its entirety for Mike Adams’ ‘Real.Video’. In the only video at the bottom of this story, Adams talks with us about how we can fight back against ‘big tech’, specifically talking about bringing a peaceful and lawful war to google.

youtube_dem.png
While Conservatives have seen the majority of the massive big tech censorship over the past year as ANP and other independent media outlets have been reporting upon regularly, this August story over at MIC reports that it’s not only Conservatives who have taken a huge hit since the election but many far-left, ‘anti-establishment’ outlets have been clobbered, too.

And as their story reports, these leftists who are being censored by facebook and other big tech outlets such as google and twitter are standing up for Alex Jones, Infowars and the 1st Amendment, not piling on Jones and Infowars as CNN, MSNBC and all of the rest of the fake news outlets as well as ‘antifa’ are doing. “Censorship is the new front on the war on consciousness” Activist Post recently reported.

So what are the differences between ‘United Nation Human Rights Law’ and the laws of the US Constitution, which protect our God-given rights here in America? The extended excerpt below comes to us from this 2015 story over at the New American which was written about how the UN has been exploiting ‘pseudo’ human rights to attack the US while their own soldiers continue to do harm to others where ever they go.

Our Rights vs Their “Rights”

Many, if not most, UN atrocities were perpetrated under the guise of bringing what the global body refers to as “human rights” to target populations. Of course, the notion of “human rights” sounds great — after all, what could be wrong with rights for humans? Unbeknownst to average Americans and humanity as a whole, though, is that the UN means something very different when it discusses “human rights” than, say, the unalienable, God-given rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

In the American system, rights such as self-defense, free speech, religious liberty, trial by jury, privacy, property, and gun ownership are endowed by the Creator upon every individual — a truth that America’s Founding Fathers viewed as “self-evident.” Because individuals’ human rights come from God, then, they cannot be legitimately infringed upon by any government. In fact, according to the Founders, government was instituted for the express purpose of protecting those God-given rights from infringement.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” explains the American Declaration of Independence, which formally gave birth to the independent United States of America. “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men.” As Alexander Hamilton put it in 1775: “The sacred rights of mankind … are written … in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.”

Under the UN’s version of human rights, however, “rights” are purportedly defined and granted to people by governments, treaties, and international organizations. Even more troubling, perhaps, is that they can be restricted or abolished by government at will under virtually any pretext, as the UN’s own “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” openly admits. And in no case may those alleged “rights” be used against the UN.

Consider Article 29 of the declaration, which claims that “everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.” Yet, separately, the same article claims that everyone has “duties to the community” and that “rights and freedoms” may “in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” For perspective, that would be like the First Amendment saying Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, unless that speech is being used to criticize Congress or otherwise makes Congress unhappy.

attacks_on_anp_7_days.png
Which is almost exactly what we’re now seeing from big tech and the left as they attempt to squash anybody or anything that will expose their corruption, corruption that has gone on for decades in this writer’s opinion.

As we see in the next screenshot above, the all-out attacks upon ANP continue with nearly 1,000 in the past week alone with a high of over 200 on Thursday, a day in which, coincidentally, or not, our story titled “A Chilling Look At China’s New ‘Digital Dictatorship’ And ‘Technological Tyranny’ Gives Us A Peek At The ‘Mark Of The Beast’ System Coming To America” sat upon the top of Steve Quayle’s website much of the day.

So what are ‘big tech’ and those who are doing the censoring of ANP so afraid of? Compared to outlets such as Breitbart, Infowars, and the Drudge Report, ANP is ‘small fries’. Rather than an entire army of reporters and editors and other staff, ANP is run daily by only Susan and I, with our awesome guest authors such as Dr Peter Vincent Pry, William Stoecker, John Velisek and Robert Kirk submitting stories whenever they want to.

In fact, we’ve invited leftist authors to submit stories to us as well for publication after our review of their stories, showing that we’re more than happy to allow our platform to be used by those who we may not agree with to get their message out. Who knows what we might learn from a well written, well sourced story that shares opposing viewpoints. Yet all the left wants to do is shut us down and shut us up. Why such a huge disparity? Freedom allows differing opinions and even what some might consider ‘hatred’. Totalitarianism doesn’t, unless its the mob rule and their hatred for anything and everything they disagree with.

soy_boys_meme.jpg
And another Conservative recently blocked out of posting on twitter was James Woods who months ago posted the absolutely hysterical ‘soy boys’ meme seen above urging men to ‘make a woman’s vote worth more‘ by staying home, a meme that even Woods in his tweet said was probably not real, though it could be, in these days of absolute liberal insanity that we’re now living through.

As twitter notified him, the tweet “has the potential to be misleading in a way that could impact an election” and as this recent Fox News story reports, Woods refuses to remove the meme on the basis of principle.

Yet how many lies does twitter allow the mainstream media to push on twitter, lies that were told by msm outlets during 2016 that were used in attempts to impact the election in Hillary Clinton’s favor? The hypocrisy from the left is clearly deafening and as Lindsey Graham recently warned, if they EVER get back into the White House, watch out! Should Democrats win in 2020, America’s final fall into tyranny will be swift and complete.

So despite all of the censorship and the numerous attacks upon us, with your help, ANP will continue to fight onwards into 2019 and hopefully far beyond. Thank you so much from both Susan and I to those who have already donated. God Bless.   (Click to Source)

CBD logo

UN agencies rebuke Trump: Abortion always part of sexual health

Stefano Gennarini, J.D.

 

NEWS – ABORTION, POLITICS – WORLD – 

annual_review_of__810_500_75_s_c1

July 20, 2018 (C-Fam) – UN agencies are working with abortion groups to make abortion part of sexual and reproductive health policies and programming everywhere and for all, in opposition to U.S. President Donald Trump’s pro-life efforts and the consensus of the UN General Assembly.

In a Lancet article provocatively titled “Defining sexual and reproductive health and rights for all,” the head of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and the head of the UN Population Fund, Natalia Kanem, gave a full-throated endorsement of a Lancet-Guttmacher report that promotes abortion and homosexual rights under the rubric of “sexual and reproductive health and rights.”

The article by Ghebreyesus and Kanem shows UN agencies are willing to promote abortion alongside the abortion industry, and on the terms set by the abortion industry. It is a direct challenge to congressional and executive U.S. funding restrictions on abortion, as well as the pro-life foreign policy of the Trump administration.

Just the title of the article is intended to close any debate about what sexual and reproductive health might include. According to the Lancet report, it includes abortion, transgender hormone therapy, surrogacy and other artificial reproductive technologies.

This flies in the face of the notion that every country may legislate on abortion as it sees fit, as the General Assembly agreed at the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development held in Cairo.

Few member states would have accepted the inclusion of abortion in UN policy at all in 1994, if not for such an ambiguous definition of “sexual and reproductive health.” In fact, UN agencies like the UN Population Fund have often told member states that each country can define the terms as they prefer. In an about-face, they are now saying the term was never up for member states to define.

While the 1994 agreement included abortion in its definition of sexual and reproductive health, it does not consider it to be an international reproductive right, thereby allowing governments to take different positions on abortion. In fact, the agreement casts abortion in a negative light.

According to the Cairo Platform for Action, governments must help women avoid abortion and must not promote abortion. The agreement states that abortion is a subject to be dealt with exclusively in national legislation without the interference of international agencies. And it presumes that countries will opt to outlaw abortion in most or all circumstances and that only “where legal, it should be made safe.”

In recent UN negotiations, the U.S. delegation vigorously defended this framework and has insisted on preserving it. While ambiguous, and even esoteric to some, this framework has stopped the development of an international right to abortion and denies UN agencies a mandate to promote access to abortion and changes in abortion laws.

Campaigners for an international right to abortion have tried in many ways to move beyond the Cairo document. Abortion groups and UN agencies have exploited the ambiguity surrounding abortion in the Cairo agreement to promote the notion of “safe abortion” for many years, but in recent years, they have ramped up their advocacy for abortion. (Click to Source)

Published with permission from C-Fam.

CBD logo

Can California Be Saved? Paul Preston and Dave Hodges- The CSS

new-california

Calexit has fallen on hard times and its George Soros backing has been exposed to the public. Therefore, the son of the owner of Wikipedia, Tim Draper who is a total globalist, is initiating a proposal to break up California into three states with gerrymandered districts designed to keep them Democratic. The readers are probably not aware of this, but the people of California are actually voting on this three-state proposal this fall. This proposal is both illegal and unconstitutional, but the proposal still made it onto the ballot.

The Common Sense Show has learned that once these 3 states are created, they will individually pursue withdrawal from the United States under a guise of being a protectorate under the UN flag. Subsequently, each of the 3 states can call in the UN, together, or separately, and under the Kigali Principles to prevent any federal government interference.

Even if the three-state proposal passes, it will be struck down by the Supreme Court because it is illegal and crosses the line into sedition. However, the insurrection has already begun, the bell cannot be “unrung”. just this week, the mayor of Portland, Ted Wheeler, sanctioned felonies committed by Portland citizens. The mayor of Portland has joined the mayor of Oakland who is guilty of sedition and treason. (Click to Source)

CLICK HERE for the finest faith based personalized and compassionate addiction recovery program – right from the comfort of your home.

Palestinian official: ‘Nikki Haley needs to shut up’

774019

American Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley faced criticism earlier this month from a top Palestinian official after a recent U.N. security council meeting in which she directly called out Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas on his lack of “courage and the will to seek peace” in the Middle East.

Haley charged that Abbas “rejected any American role in peace talks” and “insulted the American president.” Abbas has said that Palestine would not accept the United States as mediator in their conflict with Israel.

In response, Saeb Erekat, Palestinian Liberation Organization’s secretary general and member of parliament for the Palestinian government, called Haley “impudent” and said she should “shut up.”

The exchange was a product of the United States’ recent decision to move their Israeli embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and President Donald Trump declaring Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

Erekat suggested that the U.S.’s actions amount to attempts at staging a “coup” against the “Palestinian political system,” according to The Times of Israel.

“Nikki Haley needs to shut up and realize that the Palestinian leadership is not the problem,” Erekat said. “Instead, the problem is the Israeli occupation and the policies it continues to pursue. I’m not saying that the we don’t make mistakes; every society and every government makes mistakes.”

“U.S. and Israeli officials are saying that any Palestinian leader who insists on East Jerusalem becoming the capital of Palestine and is committed to the right of return, in accordance with United Nations resolution 194, should be removed from power and replaced,” he added.

During Haley’s speech to the U.N. on Jan. 25,  she encouraged leaders to acknowledge the U.S.’s efforts in promoting peace in the Middle East while simultaneously denouncing the recent actions of Abbas, who has shown that peace may not be his top priority.

“President Abbas declared the landmark Oslo Peace Accords dead. He rejected any American role in peace talks. He insulted the American President. He called for suspending recognition of Israel. He invoked an ugly and fictional past, reaching back to the 17th century to paint Israel as a colonialist project engineered by European powers,” Haley said in her speech.

“A speech that indulges in outrageous and discredited conspiracy theories is not the speech of  a person with the courage and the will to seek peace,” she added.

Coming to Abbas’ defense, Erekat reiterated that Palestinians are not seeking a battle with the U.S.

“We don’t seek a confrontation or a fight with the U.S. administration,” Erekat said. “On the contrary – they are the ones taking several steps.”

Erekat’s comments come just weeks after Palestinians set their sights on challenging Trump’s U.S. embassy move in the International Court of Justice. (Click to Source)

CLICK HERE to stock up on the finest quality reusable bags and kitchen items at the most affordable prices. Your purchases help sponsor someone in recovery at Victory Retreat Montana Online.

Report: Kenyan Women Sterilized, Latest Tragedy in Long History of “Tainted” Vaccines

1024px-a_young_child_receives_oral_polio_vaccine_dose_34692992936

1974 memo authored by Henry Kissinger recommended “injectable contraceptives” for women. Where are the SJW’s?

Recent reports are claiming that hundreds of thousands of Kenyan women have been sterilized after receiving tetanus shots. To those who have been following this story, it is all too familiar.

In 2010, Old-Thinker News reported on the efforts of the Gates Foundation and the GAVI alliance to “vaccinate the world.”

While mainstream media attacks claims of sterilization through vaccines, the fact that these vaccines exist cannot be denied.

Anti fertility vaccines have existed for decades. These vaccines work by delivering hCG (the female hormone called human chorionic gonadotrophin) attached to the tetanus vaccine, or other carriers. The human body then treats hCG, a hormone required to maintain pregnancy, as an intruder and creates antibodies against it. This has the effect of sterilizing women who receive the vaccine, and in many cases miscarriage when given during pregnancy.

Populations across the third world have received this vaccine in a depopulation program carried out by the UN, World Bank and others.

Many of these countries were specifically targeted in the U.S. Government’s 1974 National Security Memorandum 200 document for population reduction. The document, written with the assistance of globalist kingpin Henry Kissinger, recommended that “injectable contraceptives” receive further funding. It also recommends that food rationing be used to “…help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth…”

According to the local population of the Akha in Thailand, pregnant women are forced to receive vaccines in order to get ID cards for their children. The vaccine often results with miscarriage. In the video below, Matthew McDaniel, a human rights activist who has been working with the Akha people of Thailand, speaks with two Akha women about the forced Tetanus vaccine and the resulting miscarriages. (Click to Source)

CLICK HERE for Silver Sol – the natural alternative for stealth immunity protection from sickness and viruses.