A bombshell dispute has erupted in the high-profile disappearance of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie, mother of “Today” show co-host Savannah Guthrie. Allegations that the Pima County Sheriff’s Department is restricting federal access to critical forensic evidence have ignited national scrutiny — claims Sheriff Chris Nanos is forcefully denying.
Nearly two weeks after Guthrie vanished from her Tucson home, no arrests have been made. Now, the question of who controls the evidence — and where it is being tested — has become a flashpoint in an already tense investigation.
DR. ARDIS – TAKE BACK YOUR HEALTH
Discover breakthrough wellness solutions and research-backed insights designed to strengthen your immune system and restore balance naturally.
Visit: DrArdis.com
The Timeline That Raised Alarm
Investigators believe Guthrie was likely taken against her will in the early morning hours of February 1. Blood drops matching her DNA were found near the front entrance of her home. Surveillance records show her doorbell camera disconnecting at 1:47 a.m., motion detected shortly after, and her pacemaker app losing connection around 2:28 a.m.
Her cellphone, Apple Watch, and life-sustaining medication were left behind — details authorities say strongly suggest an abduction scenario rather than voluntary departure.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation later recovered backend doorbell footage showing a masked, armed individual appearing to tamper with the front camera the morning Guthrie disappeared. The bureau has offered a $50,000 reward for information leading to her recovery.
EMP SHIELD – PROTECT WHAT MATTERS MOST
Shield your home, vehicle, and electronics from EMP attacks, solar flares, and grid failure. Military-tested and government-certified protection.
Get Protected: EMPSHIELD.com
The Forensic Dispute
According to a federal law enforcement source cited by Fox News and first reported by Reuters, the FBI requested access to specific items — including a glove and DNA evidence collected inside the home — so the materials could be processed at its national crime laboratory in Quantico, Virginia.
The source claimed Sheriff Nanos instead pushed to have the evidence analyzed by a private forensic lab in Florida that has worked with the department for years.
Nanos strongly rejected suggestions that he was sidelining federal authorities. Speaking to KVOA, he stated the accusations are “not even close to the truth.” He argued that consolidating DNA samples in one lab ensures consistent profiling and marker comparison.
ESSANTE ORGANICS – CLEAN LIVING STARTS HERE
Non-toxic skincare, wellness products, and household essentials made without harmful chemicals.
Mounting Scrutiny
The friction comes amid growing criticism of investigative decisions. Some observers have questioned why the department’s thermal-imaging aircraft was not deployed until hours after Guthrie was reported missing. Others have raised concerns that repeated entries and exits from the residence could complicate chain-of-custody integrity in any future prosecution.
Federal agents have executed search warrants south of Tucson, detained and later released a man without charges, and analyzed a Bitcoin wallet connected to unverified ransom notes demanding millions. No proof of life has been publicly confirmed.
Savannah Guthrie and her siblings have issued emotional video pleas to the suspected abductors, urging them to return their mother safely.
Prophetic Context: Justice Requires Unity
Scripture warns in Luke 11:17 (NASB 1995), “Any kingdom divided against itself is laid waste; and a house divided against itself falls.” In moments of national attention, unity in the pursuit of justice is essential.
Romans 13:4 (NASB 1995) reminds us that governing authorities are “a minister of God to you for good.” Transparency and accountability are not optional — they are foundational.
Conclusion
Nearly two weeks after Nancy Guthrie disappeared, the investigation remains unresolved. Sheriff Nanos maintains cooperation with federal partners continues. The FBI continues to pursue leads and urges the public to come forward.
The dispute over forensic testing may ultimately prove procedural — but in a case of this magnitude, every decision carries weight.
Americans are watching.
Affiliate Disclosure:
Some links in my articles may bring me a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support of my work here!

Leave a comment