,

(OPINION) Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ Isn’t About Gaza — It’s About Replacing the UN

A thought-provoking commentary published February 10, 2026, by the European Policy Centre (EPC) issues a stark warning: Donald Trump’s proposed Board of Peace is less about stabilizing Gaza and far more about reshaping the architecture of global governance in a way that sidelines the United Nations. At face value, the Board of Peace was introduced…

A thought-provoking commentary published February 10, 2026, by the European Policy Centre (EPC) issues a stark warning: Donald Trump’s proposed Board of Peace is less about stabilizing Gaza and far more about reshaping the architecture of global governance in a way that sidelines the United Nations.

At face value, the Board of Peace was introduced as part of a U.S.-backed plan to oversee post-war reconstruction and governance in Gaza following the 2023–2025 conflict and its fragile ceasefire. But according to the EPC analysis, the initiative signals something much deeper — and more consequential: the normalization of crisis management outside the UN’s legal and institutional framework.

Biblical Foundation
When global leaders redefine “peace” and “order,” discernment matters. A faithful, easy-to-read Bible provides clarity when institutions shift and truth is reframed.
Explore trusted Bibles and Scripture resources on Amazon.

Sidestepping the UN at Its Weakest Moment

The timing is critical. The Board of Peace emerges as the United Nations faces severe financial strain, driven largely by unpaid U.S. dues. The EPC argues this is no coincidence. Rather than repairing the existing multilateral system, Washington appears to be circumventing it, creating parallel forums that claim efficiency precisely because they operate outside universal representation and international law.

As the EPC notes, a weakened UN rarely collapses dramatically. Instead, it becomes “a lesser option” — gradually displaced by smaller, informal bodies dominated by powerful states and wealthy contributors.

Health Research
Institutions often fail by concealment rather than collapse. Renowned researcher Dr. Bryan Ardis has shown how systems lose credibility when transparency gives way to control. Discernment is essential — in health, and in global governance.
Watch Dr. Ardis explain what the mainstream won’t.

A Precedent With Global Consequences

Supporters of the Board argue that a new forum could cut through diplomatic gridlock and deliver faster results than UN processes. Critics, particularly in Europe, see something far more dangerous: the erosion of the post-World War II order, which anchored collective security in law rather than power.

The EPC warns that funding access-based forums like the Board of Peace is not cost-neutral. Every euro or dollar redirected toward such bodies is money not sustaining UN peacekeeping, humanitarian coordination, or monitoring missions. Fragmented funding and conditional payments weaken planning, erode authority, and accelerate the UN’s marginalization.

Emergency Preparedness
As global systems strain, resilience matters. EMP Rewatch helps families and communities prepare for disruptions — from grid failures to geopolitical shocks. Preparedness is wisdom, not fear.
Learn how to protect what matters most.

Europe’s Strategic Dilemma

For Europe, the implications are profound. The European project rests on the belief that law tempers power and institutions must outlast personalities. A world where peace processes are convened ad hoc by those who control the purse strings erodes Europe’s comparative advantage and shifts power to closed rooms with fewer rules.

The EPC urges Europe, alongside the UK, Canada, Japan, India, and other democracies, to stabilize UN finances predictably — buying time for reform without conceding the field to informal substitutes. Reform driven by crisis is difficult but possible; reform after collapse is far harder.

Engage Without Endorsing

The commentary stops short of urging Europe to boycott the Board of Peace outright. If talks on Gaza occur, European actors should engage only where outcomes align with international law and existing mandates — without legitimizing alternative structures that treat universality as an inconvenience.

Faith-Based Recovery
Addiction Freedom Through the Transformational Power of Biblical Discipleship
As global systems promise order through restructuring and control, true freedom remains spiritual. Recovery Room 7 offers Christ-centered recovery rooted in Scripture, accountability, and transformation of the heart.

“Unless the Lord builds the house, they labor in vain who build it.” — Psalm 127:1
Learn how Recovery Room 7 is helping men find real freedom through Christ.

Bottom Line

The Board of Peace may never fully materialize. Legal challenges, political backlash, and internal contradictions could stall it. But the signal has already been sent. Global governance is being tested — not through reform, but through replacement.

Europe’s task is not to defend the UN as it is, but to strengthen it before it becomes irrelevant. Once the world accepts that peace can be brokered outside international law, returning to a rules-based order becomes exponentially harder.

The danger is not Gaza alone. It is a future where power migrates away from law — quietly, incrementally, and permanently.


Affiliate Disclosure:
Some links in my articles may bring me a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support of my work here!