Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a sweeping lawsuit aimed at shutting down the operations of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Brotherhood within the state of Texas, escalating an already explosive legal and political confrontation over national security, terrorism, and state sovereignty.
The lawsuit follows a move last year by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who formally designated both CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood as foreign terrorist organizations and transnational criminal entities under Texas law. That designation bars the groups and their affiliates from purchasing land in Texas and authorizes enhanced enforcement actions against them.
Paxton’s lawsuit targets CAIR’s statewide operations, including its Austin, Houston, and Dallas–Fort Worth chapters, alongside the Muslim Brotherhood itself.
Texas Draws a Hard Line
In announcing the lawsuit, Paxton did not mince words about the threat he believes the organizations pose.
“The Muslim Brotherhood exists to usurp governmental power and establish dominion through sharia law,” Paxton said, adding that radical Islamist ideology is incompatible with Texas law, culture, and constitutional governance.
Paxton also cited the conviction of a founding member of CAIR Texas in 2008 for funneling $12.4 million to Hamas, reinforcing the state’s claim that the organization has historic and ideological ties to terrorist activity.
“Sharia law and the jihadists who follow sharia law have no business being in Texas,” Paxton stated. “Radical Islamic terrorists are antithetical to law and order, endanger the people of Texas, and are an existential threat to our values.”
As states increasingly act independently to defend sovereignty and security, Americans are waking up to how fragile centralized systems really are. EMP protection, Faraday gear, and emergency radios are no longer fringe—they’re preparedness essentials.
CAIR Pushes Back
CAIR immediately dismissed the lawsuit, calling it a “frivolous, politically motivated anti-Muslim publicity stunt.” The organization emphasized that neither CAIR nor the Muslim Brotherhood has been designated as a terrorist organization by the federal government.
In a statement, CAIR accused Paxton of abusing his office and targeting minority groups for political gain.
“The people of Texas elected Mr. Paxton to serve them, not to silence them for daring to oppose Israel’s actions in Gaza,” CAIR said, vowing to continue operating despite the legal challenge.
The group compared the lawsuit to Paxton’s recent failed attempt to shut down a Latino voting-rights organization, suggesting the courts will again reject the state’s actions.
State vs. Federal Authority
At the heart of the case is a fundamental constitutional question: how much authority does a state have to designate and restrict organizations it views as national security threats when the federal government has not acted?
Texas officials argue that the Constitution does not require states to wait for Washington when protecting their citizens, particularly when foreign ideological movements are involved. Critics warn that the precedent could be used to suppress political dissent or religious organizations.
Meanwhile, supporters of Abbott and Paxton see the lawsuit as long overdue.
Political and cultural battles don’t just play out in courtrooms—they take a toll on real people. Real Time Pain Relief Cream delivers fast, drug-free relief trusted by veterans and first responders nationwide.
Broader Implications
The lawsuit lands amid rising national tensions over:
- Islamic activism and terrorism concerns
- State sovereignty versus federal inaction
- Middle East conflicts spilling into U.S. politics
- The role of NGOs and advocacy groups inside America
Texas is positioning itself as a firewall state—willing to act where Washington hesitates.
Whether the courts agree will determine not only the future of CAIR in Texas, but potentially the scope of state power nationwide.
Conclusion
Texas has fired a legal broadside against two organizations it considers hostile to American values and state security. The outcome will test the limits of state authority, redefine the legal status of activist organizations, and set a precedent other states are watching closely.
One thing is certain: the fight between Texas and CAIR is far from over—and its consequences may ripple far beyond the Lone Star State.
Affiliate Disclosure:
Some links in my articles may bring me a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support of my work here!
The Blogging Hounds 
Leave a comment