The Blogging Hounds

Russia’s most prominent state television propagandist has openly called for the use of nuclear weapons in space to destroy Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite network, escalating rhetoric around the war in Ukraine into the realm of orbital warfare.

The demand came after Elon Musk confirmed that SpaceX had acted to block unauthorized Russian forces from using the Starlink satellite internet system to conduct attacks against Ukraine.

Appearing on Russian state television, Vladimir Solovyov — widely described as President Vladimir Putin’s chief media mouthpiece — framed Starlink as a direct military threat to Russia.

“Militarisation of Space”

“Let’s tell the truth about what Starlink is,” Solovyov said.
“It is the militarisation of space, because everything that Musk has worked on… is in the interests of a war against Russia.”

Solovyov went further, openly questioning why Starlink satellites should not be targeted.

“I do not understand why, for example, Elon Musk’s satellites are not a legitimate target for us?” he asked.
“One detonation of nuclear weapons in space, as I understand it, solves this problem quite seriously.”

The comments mark one of the clearest public endorsements yet by Russian state media figures for nuclear anti-satellite warfare — a move that would fundamentally alter global communications, military operations, and civilian infrastructure.

Modern civilization now depends on space-based systems far more than most people realize. Communications, navigation, banking, logistics, and emergency services all rely on satellites operating far above Earth.

That fragility is exactly why I don’t assume space-based systems will always be there when needed. This is the grid-down and EMP protection setup I rely on for scenarios where modern infrastructure fails — whether from cyberattack or worse.

Even Russian Experts Admit the Risk

Not everyone on Russian television endorsed Solovyov’s proposal. Retired Lt-Gen Evgeny Buzhinsky, a Russian military analyst, warned that a nuclear explosion in space would not be selective.

“Unfortunately, a nuclear explosion in space affects our own satellites as well,” Buzhinsky cautioned.

Solovyov dismissed the concern, arguing that Russia already lags behind the West in satellite technology.

“Taking into account how much we are lagging behind… so what?” he replied, sarcastically suggesting Russia could revert to “carrier pigeons” and shouting to communicate.

The exchange underscores a dangerous mindset: if Russia cannot dominate space, it may attempt to deny it to everyone else.

Starlink’s Role in the Ukraine War

Ukraine’s military relies heavily on Starlink for battlefield communications, drone operations, and coordination across front lines. The system has been widely credited with giving Ukrainian forces a critical technological edge.

However, evidence has also emerged that Russian troops were using Starlink terminals without authorization. Footage has shown Russian forces attaching Starlink units to long-range drones — and even to a horse — prompting Kyiv to appeal directly to Musk.

Musk later confirmed SpaceX had acted.

“Looks like the steps we took to stop the unauthorised use of Starlink by Russia have worked,” he said. “Let us know if more needs to be done.”

A New Front: Space Warfare

Threats to detonate nuclear weapons in space violate long-standing international norms and would risk creating massive debris fields capable of disabling satellites from every nation, including the United States, Europe, and China.

But Russia’s rhetoric reflects a broader trend: the weaponization of space as the next battlefield domain.

When institutions normalize catastrophic risk — whether in war, medicine, or energy — independent analysis becomes essential.

That’s why I pay close attention to voices outside official narratives. Dr. Bryan Ardis has repeatedly warned about institutional blind spots and escalation risks ignored by mainstream experts. His work changed how I evaluate “expert consensus.”

Strategic Implications

A nuclear strike in orbit would:

• Disrupt global communications and navigation
• Cripple military and civilian satellite networks
• Trigger cascading economic and security failures
• Potentially make large portions of orbit unusable for decades

In short, it would be a planet-wide event, not a regional military tactic.

And like other systemic risks, the downstream effects would quickly reach food systems, medicine supply chains, and civilian resilience.

That’s why I don’t assume industrial systems will always function as advertised. This is the nutritional company I trust when quality, transparency, and reliability matter most.

Conclusion

Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in space to destroy Starlink is not idle rhetoric. It reflects a growing willingness among Kremlin-aligned voices to escalate conflicts beyond Earth itself.

As warfare expands into space, the vulnerability of modern civilization becomes harder to ignore. Systems once considered untouchable are now openly discussed as targets.

Understanding this moment requires grounding — not panic, and not propaganda.

If you read one book to anchor yourself right now, make it this.

The future of warfare may be unfolding above our heads — and pretending otherwise is no longer an option.

---

Affiliate Disclosure:
Some links in my articles may bring me a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support of my work here!