Russian President Vladimir Putin has publicly claimed that the United States and Russia are in talks about jointly managing the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant without Ukraine’s involvement — a development that, if accurate, would represent a stark shift in the diplomatic framework for resolving one of the war’s most sensitive flashpoints.
Putin’s Assertions on Joint Management
According to the pro-Kremlin outlet Kommersant, Putin stated that discussions between Washington and Moscow have included Russia’s continued control of the nuclear facility — Europe’s largest — which Russia has occupied since March 2022. In his remarks, Putin insisted that Ukraine would not be part of the plant’s management.
Putin also claimed the U.S. showed interest in the site for unconventional purposes, including cryptocurrency mining, though no verified evidence supports this characterization beyond Putin’s statement.
He added that Ukrainian specialists currently working at the plant have reportedly received Russian passports, a claim consistent with Russia’s ongoing efforts to integrate occupied territories administratively.
The Bomb: Presidents, Generals, and the Secret History of Nuclear War (Hardcover)
US Proposal and Ukrainian Rejection
The United States has publicly proposed a tripartite management structure involving Ukraine, the United States, and Russia as part of broader peace negotiations. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has described control over Zaporizhzhia as one of the most difficult issues in the U.S. peace plan.
Zelenskyy has repeatedly insisted that Russia must be removed from operational control, arguing that Moscow’s presence at a nuclear facility during an active conflict poses unacceptable safety risks.
International atomic energy regulators have echoed these concerns, noting that the plant’s militarization — including deployment of heavy equipment and troops — increases the risk of an accident.
Deep Dive: Facts on the Ground
Confirmed Realities:
- Zaporizhzhia has been under Russian military occupation since March 2022.
- Russian forces have repeatedly positioned military assets near reactor buildings — a practice criticized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for safety reasons.
- Attempts by Russia to connect the facility to the Russian power grid have been blocked due to engineering and regulatory objections.
Unverified or Contested Claims:
- There is no independent confirmation that U.S. negotiators have formally entertained excluding Ukraine from plant management.
- Putin’s assertion regarding U.S. interest in cryptocurrency mining at the site has no corroboration from U.S. officials or credible journalistic sources.
This piece is based on on-the-record reporting from Kommersant, statements by Putin and Zelenskyy, and widely documented facts about the plant’s occupation and international regulatory involvement.
Prophetic Context
The convergence of nuclear risk and geopolitical conflict resonates with prophetic warnings about nations endangering peace:
The Zaporizhzhia plant has been at the center of conflict-related standoffs for years, underscoring the fragility of peace where powerful nations contest vital infrastructure.
Strategic Implications
- Nuclear Safety Risks: Independent control of Zaporizhzhia by Russia raises the stakes of a nuclear incident that could transcend borders.
- Diplomatic Breakdown: Excluding Ukraine from management would undermine the legitimacy of any negotiated settlement and further erode trust.
- Geopolitical Signaling: Putin’s framing may aim to test Western resolve or extract concessions in broader peace talks.
- International Law: Any arrangement sidelining Ukraine could conflict with established norms on sovereign control of nuclear assets.
Analysts warn that hardened positions on Zaporizhzhia could derail the broader ceasefire and security guarantee discussions currently underway between Kyiv, Washington, and allied partners.
1-Year Emergency Food Supply (2,000+ calories/day)
Conclusion
As international mediators work to bridge disparate views, Putin’s public claims — whether current policy or strategic messaging — place control of one of Europe’s most sensitive nuclear facilities at the heart of post-war negotiations. The stakes are high: legitimate safety concerns, sovereign rights, and the broader architecture of peace rest on how this issue is resolved.
Affiliate Disclosure:
Some links in my articles may bring me a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support of my work here!
End of the Year Sale – EMP Shield’s family of products are designed to protect against electromagnetic pulse (EMP), lightning, power surges, and coronal mass ejection (CME)
New Year Blowout Sale – My Patriot Supply – Take advantage of limited-time deals on emergency food kits, water filtration, solar backup systems, and much more.
The Blogging Hounds 
Leave a comment