Weather has long been treated as an act of God. History, however, shows it has also been treated as a weapon. From confirmed U.S. rainmaking operations during the Vietnam War to modern military research papers openly discussing “owning the weather,” concerns are resurfacing after the devastating 2025 storm known as “Ditwah” struck Sri Lanka. While no conclusive proof has been presented that the storm was engineered, the convergence of history, doctrine, and geopolitics has revived questions many governments prefer to keep off the table.
Operation Popeye and the Birth of Weather Warfare
The use of environmental modification as a weapon is not speculative history. Operation Popeye, conducted by the United States between 1963 and 1972, involved cloud-seeding to extend monsoon seasons over Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. Its goal was to flood supply routes such as the Ho Chi Minh Trail. The program was exposed by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh, prompting international outrage.
That outrage led directly to the 1977 Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD), which prohibits the hostile use of environmental modification techniques. ENMOD entered into force in 1978 and remains binding international law.
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
Military Doctrine: “Owning the Weather”
In 1997, the U.S. Air Force published a research paper titled Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025. The document examined how future military forces could exploit weather modification for strategic advantage, including precipitation enhancement, storm manipulation, and weather denial. While the paper was theoretical, it acknowledged ethical concerns while still advocating continued research as a matter of national security.
The existence of this doctrine is factual. Whether it has been operationalized in modern conflicts remains debated.
Storm Ditwah and Sri Lanka: Questions Without Conclusions
In late November 2025, Sri Lanka experienced catastrophic flooding, landslides, and infrastructure damage attributed to Cyclone Ditwah. The storm disrupted energy systems, food production, and transport corridors just as the tourism season began.
Analysts have raised concerns—not proof—about the timing of U.S. military and meteorological personnel arriving shortly before the disaster, and the presence of aircraft historically capable of weather reconnaissance. U.S. officials stated their mission was humanitarian. No public evidence has confirmed hostile environmental modification.
Still, Sri Lanka’s strategic position astride Indian Ocean trade routes, submarine data cables, and naval chokepoints makes any disruption geopolitically significant.
Ready Hour 4-in-1 Emergency Solar Flashlight & AM/FM/Weather Radio w/ Hand Crank
Environmental Warfare and Plausible Deniability
Hybrid warfare increasingly favors non-kinetic tools—cyberattacks, infrastructure sabotage, and economic pressure. Environmental disruption fits this model precisely because it offers plausible deniability. Floods, droughts, and storms can always be attributed to climate variability, even when history shows weather manipulation has been weaponized before.
The ENMOD treaty exists precisely because the international community recognized this danger decades ago.
Prophetic Context
Scripture warns that creation itself will groan under human sin and conflict. Romans 8:22 (NASB 1977) states, “For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now.” Jesus also warned of escalating disasters preceding the end of the age (Matthew 24:7). These passages do not assign blame, but they describe an era marked by upheaval—natural and man-made.
Strategic Implications
If environmental manipulation were ever normalized again, it would destabilize global norms, undermine international law, and weaponize civilian suffering. For island nations and developing states, the consequences would be existential: food insecurity, debt dependence, and sovereignty erosion.
Even the perception of weather warfare erodes trust and raises the risk of escalation.
65W Power Bank w/ 15W Solar Panel by Grid Doctor
Conclusion
Operation Popeye proved weather warfare is real history, not conspiracy. ENMOD proves the world recognized the danger. Storm Ditwah does not prove geoengineering—but it reminds us that environmental warfare remains technically feasible, strategically tempting, and legally prohibited. Serious nations should be asking hard questions, not dismissing them.
Affiliate Disclosure:
Some links in my articles may bring me a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support of my work here!
My Patriot Supply – Take advantage of limited-time deals on emergency food kits, water filtration, solar backup systems, and much more.
Essante Organics – Your dream shop Guaranteed, Organic, Toxic Free, and pH Balanced Products. That’s It.

Leave a comment