By The Blogging Hounds
Since the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk, speculation has swirled online about the official FBI narrative. Chief among the questions: why was there no exit wound from what authorities claimed was a high-powered rifle shot? Now, Turning Point USA spokesperson and longtime executive director for The Charlie Kirk Show, Andrew Kolvet, has directly addressed the mystery—and his statements are only raising more eyebrows.
Candace Owens Fuels Questions
The controversy escalated when conservative commentator Candace Owens revealed she had viewed footage from a missing camera positioned behind Kirk at the time of the assassination. “The video shows no blood and NO sign of an exit wound,” Owens declared. If true, this would fundamentally challenge the FBI’s narrative of a frontal rifle shot fired by alleged lone gunman Tyler Robinson.
Kolvet: ‘A Miracle in the Midst of Tragedy’
In a detailed post on X, Kolvet acknowledged the widespread doubts but reframed the lack of an exit wound as a medical miracle:
“The fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know.”
Kolvet said he spoke directly with the surgeon who worked on Kirk in the hospital. The doctor admitted the bullet “absolutely should have gone through” based on its caliber and velocity. “This would have taken a moose or an elk down,” the doctor reportedly told Kolvet. “But it didn’t go through. Charlie’s body stopped it.”
According to Kolvet, the surgeon was stunned at Kirk’s bone density and health, calling him “like the man of steel.” The coroner later recovered the bullet lodged just beneath Kirk’s skin. “Even in death,” Kolvet wrote, “Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him.”
Lingering Questions About Missing Footage
While Kolvet insists the lack of an exit wound was miraculous rather than suspicious, he also confirmed another troubling fact: the SD cards were removed from cameras at the scene of the assassination. That revelation only fuels further distrust of the FBI’s account. Why was critical surveillance footage missing? Why did it take a commentator like Candace Owens, rather than law enforcement, to reveal the existence of rear-angle footage?
Pattern of Obfuscation
These unanswered questions echo a troubling pattern in politically explosive cases: the selective release of evidence, contradictions in official reports, and swift branding of alternative theories as “conspiracies.” The FBI’s insistence on a lone shooter—despite conflicting testimony and now medical anomalies—has only deepened public skepticism.
Prophetic and Political Implications
Charlie Kirk’s assassination is more than a political tragedy. It is symbolic of the war against truth, free speech, and Christianity itself. Revelation warns that in the last days, truth will be cast down (Daniel 8:12) and believers will be hated for Christ’s name (Matthew 24:9). Whether by omission, cover-up, or incompetence, the suppression of evidence in Kirk’s case mirrors the prophetic trajectory: a system hostile to accountability, truth, and faith.
The “miracle” of the bullet lodging in Kirk’s body instead of passing through may well have saved dozens of others in the tent. But the unanswered questions—the missing footage, the lone shooter narrative, and the FBI’s selective disclosures—point to something far darker at work. In the end, the American people must decide: will they accept official narratives at face value, or will they demand the full truth about who killed Charlie Kirk, and why?
Enjoying Our Content? Help Keep It Going!
When you shop through one of our hand-picked affiliate links below , you’re directly supporting this blog. We’re truly grateful for your support!

Jesus doesn’t manage addiction. He ends it forever.
Dr. Ardis Store – Trusted by Thousands, Feared by Big Pharma. Start Your Health Revolution Here.
Peets Coffee – Discover Mighty Leaf’s most popular teas. teas.

Leave a comment