California School District Forces Parents To Declare Daughters ‘Mentally Ill’ For Refusing Boys In Bathrooms

By The Blogging Hounds In a shocking development, California’s Temecula Valley Unified School District is requiring parents to fill out mental health forms labeling their daughters as “mentally ill” if they refuse to share restrooms and locker rooms with male students. The disturbing practice—exposed this week by women’s rights activist Riley Gaines—marks a new phase…

By The Blogging Hounds

In a shocking development, California’s Temecula Valley Unified School District is requiring parents to fill out mental health forms labeling their daughters as “mentally ill” if they refuse to share restrooms and locker rooms with male students. The disturbing practice—exposed this week by women’s rights activist Riley Gaines—marks a new phase in the coercive enforcement of radical gender ideology in America’s schools, where girls’ basic privacy rights are now pathologized as psychological disorders.

Girls’ Privacy Recast As ‘Mental Illness’
Riley Gaines revealed the scheme in a Wednesday X post, recounting how a California mother contacted her in disbelief.

“Her daughter had to fill out a mental health accommodation form declaring that she had a mental health issue for, get this, not wanting to share the restroom locker room bathroom with a boy,” Gaines wrote.
The “Mental Health Accommodation Request Form,” stamped with the district’s logo, requires parents to submit details of their child’s supposed “mental health condition” to justify not being forced into intimate spaces with biological males.

Gaslighting By Policy
Instead of respecting female students’ legitimate concerns, the district’s policy effectively brands them as unstable or “deranged” for resisting biological males in bathrooms and changing rooms. Gaines blasted the double standard:

“In California, if you’re a girl who doesn’t want to have to use the restroom next to a boy or forcibly undress next to a boy, that makes you mentally deranged—not the boy who wants to be in that space, the boy declaring himself to be something that he’s not.”
The activist sarcastically added:
“Go ahead and give me a lobotomy if that’s the standard for being mentally deranged—believing that girls’ bathrooms are only for girls and vice versa.”

A Broader Agenda Of Coercion
The form cites federal and state laws, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), weaponizing disability frameworks to force compliance with gender ideology. By redefining normal, instinctual boundaries as “mental health issues,” bureaucrats are laying the groundwork for a chilling new precedent—one where dissent itself is diagnosed as a disorder.

Public Outcry Mounts
The revelation sparked outrage online. Popular account @LibsofTikTok highlighted the hypocrisy:

“The boys pretending to be girls and invading girls’ spaces are fine, but the girls who don’t want boys in their bathrooms are the problem. INSANE.”
Conservative activist Lindsey Graham, known as “The Patriot Barbie,” urged parents to show up at upcoming school board meetings to demand accountability, warning that Temecula’s experiment may be a test case for a nationwide rollout.

Prophetic Implications: Calling Evil Good
For many Christians, this policy is yet another sign of Isaiah 5:20 in action: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.” Girls who stand for modesty, safety, and God-given distinctions between male and female are now branded mentally unwell, while those who blur those lines are celebrated as enlightened. The inversion of truth, dignity, and morality reflects the prophetic warnings of a society spiraling toward lawlessness.

The Line In The Sand
Temecula’s policy is a chilling reminder that parental rights, religious conviction, and female safety are under direct assault. Parents across America must recognize what is at stake. If young girls are forced to choose between their safety and being labeled “mentally ill,” the future belongs not to freedom but to tyranny masked as inclusion.

Enjoying Our Content? Help Keep It Going!
When you shop through one of our hand-picked affiliate links below , you’re directly supporting this blog. We’re truly grateful for your support!