By The Blogging Hounds
On July 18, the United States formally rejected the World Health Organization’s 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), citing direct threats to national sovereignty, free speech, and constitutional protections. The decision—announced in a joint statement by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Secretary of State Marco Rubio—marks one of the sharpest rejections of the WHO’s global health power grab to date.
Austria, Italy, and Israel also rejected or filed objections before the July 19, 2025 deadline, each emphasizing the principle of local control over health policy. The UK, however—already branded the “global censorship hub” through its Online Safety Act—accepted the WHO’s sweeping new authority, raising concerns that London will act as an enforcement arm for international narrative control.
What the WHO Amendments Would Have Done
If adopted, the 2024 IHR amendments would have allowed the WHO to override national health sovereignty by:
- Declaring global pandemics or “public health emergencies” without input from elected officials
- Pressuring governments to impose lockdowns, quarantines, and travel restrictions
- Requiring adoption of digital health passports and vaccine documentation systems
- Compelling “risk communication” programs that critics say translate to narrative control and censorship
- Enforcing compliance under vague terms like “health equity” and “global solidarity”
In effect, the rules would have enshrined unelected WHO bureaucrats as arbiters of lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and public speech—bypassing national constitutions and parliaments.
US and Allies Push Back
Kennedy Jr. made clear the U.S. would not tolerate such overreach:
“The United States can cooperate with other nations without jeopardizing our civil liberties, without undermining our Constitution, and without ceding away America’s treasured sovereignty.”
Austria lodged a legal objection to prevent automatic enforcement, Italy issued a full rejection backed by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and Israel formally withdrew after months of parliamentary review. All three joined Washington in rejecting unelected global oversight.
The UK’s Troubling Role
By contrast, the UK government aligned itself with the WHO amendments—at the same time it pushes the Online Safety Act, one of the most draconian censorship laws in the Western world. Critics warn this pairing effectively hands the WHO a censorship enforcement mechanism via Britain’s new digital regime, which already reaches across borders into American online discourse.
The implication is chilling: global health decrees shaped in Geneva could be enforced online through London’s censorship apparatus, controlling what citizens worldwide are allowed to say, share, or even search.
Globalist Agenda and Prophetic Implications
This struggle over the IHR amendments is not just a legal or bureaucratic matter—it is a flashpoint in the globalist project to centralize authority over nations, suppress dissent, and digitize human compliance. From vaccine passports to censorship boards, the infrastructure of Revelation’s “beast system” is being laid brick by brick. The rejection by the US, Italy, Israel, and Austria shows that not all nations are ready to kneel before this unelected order.
But with the UK and much of Europe surrendering sovereignty, the danger of a WHO-directed censorship regime is very real. The prophetic warning is clear: a world system that controls buying, selling, movement, and speech is emerging before our eyes.
What You Can Do
- Check your country’s official stance on the IHR amendments
- Pressure your representatives to reject the amendments if they haven’t already
- Inform your community of the stakes: freedom vs. globalist control
- Organize locally to defend medical and constitutional autonomy
Enjoying Our Content? Help Keep It Going!
When you shop through one of our hand-picked affiliate links below , you’re directly supporting this blog. We’re truly grateful for your support!

Jesus doesn’t manage addiction. He ends it forever.
Dr. Ardis Store – Trusted by Thousands, Feared by Big Pharma. Start Your Health Revolution Here.
Peets Coffee – Discover Mighty Leaf’s most popular teas.
After much research, the following supplements can prevent Covid and other viruses. My family and I mainly follow the protocol of Dr Bryan Ardis. This is only my opinion based on my own family’s success. Please make sure you do your own research and speak with your medical professional before making any changes to your health routine.
EDTA
Glutathion
NAC
Zinc
Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid)
Vitamin D3
Quercetin
Cats Claw
Nicotine
Bromelain
Curcumin
Dr. McCullough recommends taking this treatment triad for at least three months for anyone suffering from or worried about post-COVID or post-vaccine syndromes.
Nattokinase, Bromelain, and Curcumin are available over the counter at just about any health food store or pharmacy.
Selenium
Dandelion Root
Black Sativa Extract (may facilitate cellular repair)
Green Tea Extract (provides added defenses at the cellular level through scavenging for free radicals)
Irish Sea Moss (could help rebuild damaged tissue and muscle)
In an acute emergency, if you get Covid, Dr Ardis suggests taking low doses of Nicotine in the form of Lozenges, Gum, or Patches for a few days until symptoms subside.

Leave a comment