Scientists Push Plan to Spread Fatal Meat Allergy Among Public to ‘Fight Climate Change’

By The Blogging Hounds Bioethicists Propose Weaponizing Ticks to Force Americans Off MeatA shocking proposal from scientists at Western Michigan University has revealed a plan to deliberately spread a tick-borne disease capable of inducing a lifelong and potentially fatal allergy to red meat. The plan, published in the peer-reviewed journal Bioethics, is being framed as…

By The Blogging Hounds

Bioethicists Propose Weaponizing Ticks to Force Americans Off Meat
A shocking proposal from scientists at Western Michigan University has revealed a plan to deliberately spread a tick-borne disease capable of inducing a lifelong and potentially fatal allergy to red meat. The plan, published in the peer-reviewed journal Bioethics, is being framed as a necessary step to meet globalist “Net Zero” climate goals—but critics warn it risks turning public health into a weapon.

Medical ethics professors Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth argue that proliferating the lone star tick across the United States may be a “moral obligation.” The tick injects a sugar molecule called alpha-gal, triggering Alpha-Gal Syndrome (AGS), a severe allergic reaction to beef, pork, lamb, dairy products, gelatin, and even some medications.

Alpha-Gal Syndrome: A Deadly Climate “Solution”
AGS can lead to hives, stomach pain, dangerously low blood pressure, and in extreme cases, anaphylaxis—potentially fatal reactions. The CDC reports nearly 450,000 Americans have been affected between 2010 and 2022, with cases rising as the tick spreads northward. At least 10 deaths have already been linked to alpha-gal reactions from medical products like cancer drugs and blood thinners.

Crutchfield and Hereth suggest that deliberately spreading the syndrome could function as a “moral bioenhancer” to curb meat consumption and “save the planet” from what they call “global boiling.” The authors openly discuss genetically engineering ticks to enhance disease transmission, effectively weaponizing a public health crisis to control Americans’ diets.

The Globalist Agenda Behind the Proposal
This plan is not just a scientific experiment—it’s an example of how climate ideology can be used as a cover for extreme measures that infringe on personal freedom. By turning a parasite into a vector for dietary control, policymakers could justify restricting access to meat, dairy, and even certain medications, all under the banner of environmental responsibility.

The lone star tick is already expanding across the U.S., from the Southeast and Midwest into states like New York and Pennsylvania. CDC guidelines currently emphasize protective clothing and repellents—not deliberate proliferation. Critics warn that embracing such a proposal represents a dangerous precedent: using engineered disease to manipulate the public under the guise of globalist climate mandates.

A Dire Warning for Personal Freedom and Public Health
If proposals like this gain traction in policymaking circles, Americans could face unprecedented limitations on what they eat, the medicines they can take, and ultimately, their ability to control their own bodies. The ethical veneer of “climate salvation” risks masking a dystopian strategy: weaponizing disease to enforce compliance with an elite-driven environmental agenda.

Enjoying Our Content? Help Keep It Going!
When you shop through one of our hand-picked affiliate links below , you’re directly supporting this blog. We’re truly grateful for your support!