Dr. Simone Gold of America’s Frontline Doctors was recently interviewed by Michelle Malkin. During the interview, she posed serious concerns over the marketing propaganda of Big Pharma companies and the media concerning the push for widespread use of the experimental vaccine for COVID-19, especially among pregnant women.
During the interview, Gold said that there has always been caution for pregnant women or those who sought to become pregnant taking any type of experimental medication.
She even mentioned that women in the past have been cautious about taking Tylenol or other rather benign drugs due to the care women have for their unborn children. However, pregnant women been used in the testing of COVID vaccines, some have been encouraged to getting it to protect them and their unborn babies. In some cases, there seems to have been a clear tie to the mothers actually miscarrying following receiving the jab and it’s very possible that it may prevent them in some manner from either getting pregnant again or having difficulty carrying the baby to full term. This is something that our YouTube platform was deplatformed for because we were warning about it when Dr. Carrie Madej spoke about known sterilizing ingredients found in some of the COVID vaccines.
Dr. Gold also referenced the material I referenced on Friday’s The Sons of Liberty morning show concerning the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. She pointed out the adverse effects, especially the nearly 500 deaths that have resulted from the COVID vaccine.
Additionally, Gold made reference to the violation of the Nuremberg code, of which The Sons of Liberty’s health and wellness expert Kate Shemirani has also made mention, along with Dr. Kevin Corbett.
According to The Nuremberg Code (1947), “The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
- The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
- The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
- The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
- The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
- No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment..
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
- During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
- During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
Gold also warns of the same thing the Dr. Sherri Tenpenny has warned about and that is the antibody-dependent enhancement, which causes those who receive the vaccine to seem OK at first until they encounter said virus in the future.
The interview is highly informative, but we know that Big Pharma, corrupt politicians and Big Tech are working hand in glove to depopulate the planet and bring us into an ungodly, new world order. They are all pushing a propaganda of fear and the administration of “vaccines” which are neither safe nor effective. They are also working to not only provide immunity for themselves for their crimes against the people but openly attempting to silence the free speech of the people who war against their lying narrative regarding CONvid-1984, the real numbers associated and any means of relief people may have at their disposal rather than the drugs and injections they are pimping. (Click to Source)
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media