United Nations: Mandatory ‘Inclusive’ Sex-Ed Must Be Taught in School AND at Home

Comprehensive sexuality education’ has anatomical diagrams not labeled as male or female

By: Jay Greenberg  |@NeonNettle on 27th November 2020 @ 12.00pm

The United Nations (UN) is pushing for a controversial “inclusive” sex education to be taught to children in schools and while they’re at home.

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has published a guidance document to ensure that the UN’s mandatory sex-ed is forced on to kids, wherever they are.

The new document “complements and refers to” the radical technical guidance on “comprehensive sexuality education” (CSE).

The CSE was published in 2018 by UNESCO, triggering controversy over its lack of biological gender labels and promotions of far-left Marxist ideology.

Despite the fact that CSE was met with widespread opposition to it in countries and local communities, and was rejected by the General Assembly, UNFPA has set out to ensure it’s taught to children no matter what.

It would be a mandatory requirement for children in school, out of school, and even at home, according to LifeSite News.

the sex ed controversially promotes teaching children that gender is a social construct as early as five years old
The sex-ed controversially promotes teaching children that gender is a social construct as early as five years old

According to UNFPA, “comprehensive sexuality education” might be delivered by computers or phones, or in face-to-face settings such as youth centers, summer camps, religious organizations, and refugee camps. 

Out of school, it could also “include challenging topics” and frame issues “in a way that may not always be feasible or acceptable in school settings.”

The guidance contains large sections on sexual orientation and gender identity, and while it acknowledges the “absence of extensive literature” on sex education for children who identify as transgender, it based its recommendations on interviews with members of transgender organizations

Based on these conversations, UNFPA calls for “inclusive” anatomical diagrams that are not labeled as male and female and where “body parts should not be assigned to one gender.” 

If possible, the guidance urges facilitators to “sensitize parents about gender identity.”

The guidance also addresses the delivery of “comprehensive sexuality education” to child prostitutes.

While acknowledging that prostitution under the age of 18 is considered exploitation regardless of the child’s willingness, it also insists that “sex work is consensual sex between adults.” 

Its recommendations are therefore intended for those over 18, although the “legal, political, and ethical challenges” in providing the controversial program to prostituted minors “should not … be used as a justification for keeping young people under 18 from accessing information, prevention, and care services.”

The guidance encourages facilitators to use “critical pedagogy” as developed by the Brazilian Marxist scholar Paulo Freire and guides students to “question and challenge prevailing power dynamics and domination.”

the guidance includes ideas developed by marxist scholar paulo freire
The guidance includes ideas developed by Marxist scholar Paulo Freire

The 2018 UNESCO guide on sex-ed controversially promoted teaching children that gender is a social construct as early as five years old, and promoted “non-traditional” family structures, as well as a heavy emphasis on LGBTQ+ rights. 

It also notably called for the program to be mandatory in schools.

This new guidance, along with other UNFPA initiatives promoting peer education by young people themselves, is part of a larger effort to ensure that no child can escape the most controversial elements of the UN’s sex-ed curricula.

The publication of the new guidance was funded by Norway, one of the leading proponents at the UN of sex-ed. 

At last year’s UNFPA-sponsored Nairobi Summit, Norway pledged to support “comprehensive sexuality education” both in and out of school, adding that it “mainly supports CSE through UNFPA, UNESCO and the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF).” (Click to Source)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s