If you are among the millions of Americans trying to understand how Hillary’s e-mail crimes morphed into a Russian hack of the U.S. Presidential election, please read on.
On Friday afternoon, “the intelligence community” released it’s report on Russian efforts to hack last November’s Presidential election. The report said in part:
“We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump”.
The report was released just one day after top intelligence officials, including Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (already an admitted perjurer) and National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee on the issue. Clapper told the Senators that the intelligence community has grown more “resolute” in its assessment that Russian intelligence was involved in the hacks aimed at the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. The “intelligence community” released no evidence to support this charge and refused to identify even one example of Russian interference. The clear intent was to demonize Russia and, by extension, to damage Donald Trump.
If one looks at this in the right frame of mind, it is almost too funny for words. There is absolutely no evidence in the report or in the testimony to remotely suggest that the Russian government (or private Russian citizens, for that matter) released Hillary Clinton’s e-mail to Wikileaks and that is what this kerfuffle is all about. For his part, Wikileaks’ Julian Assange has repeatedly denied that Hillary’s embarrassing e-mails were provided by Russians.
A far more likely source is former Congressman and serial sexter Anthony Weiner (aka “Carlos Danger”), the estranged husband of Hillary Clinton’s closest aide, Huma Abedin. Weiner possesses all the attributes of a prime suspect in this caper. He had: (Click to Article)